<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Guardrails on Eugeniusz Zabłocki Blog</title>
    <link>https://ezablocki.com/tags/guardrails/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Guardrails on Eugeniusz Zabłocki Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>© Eugeniusz Zabłocki</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 10:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ezablocki.com/tags/guardrails/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Lodash Lesson: Building Hard Guardrails for Security Agents</title>
      <link>https://ezablocki.com/posts/lodash-lesson-building-hard-guardrails-ai/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://ezablocki.com/posts/lodash-lesson-building-hard-guardrails-ai/</guid>
      <description>Large Language Models have a fatal flaw when it comes to security: they are people-pleasers. They are trained to be helpful, which means they naturally lean towards giving you a green light.
When building our stateful dependency auditor, we ran into this exact problem. If you rely purely on an LLM to make security decisions, it will eventually prioritize a friendly legal license over critical CVEs.
The problem isn&amp;rsquo;t that the AI is stupid; it&amp;rsquo;s that it lacks deterministic boundaries.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
